You are seeing the paginated version of the page.
It was specially created to help search engines like Google to build the proper search index.

Click to load the full version of the page
Argument mapping - what, why, and how — Swarmcheck
Have you ever realized that you and your opponent are talking over one another during a heated argument? Introducing argument mapping, a powerful method that can transform the way you approach conflicts, whether you're a seasoned debater or just trying to improve your critical thinking abilities. In
Original link
Rationale docs
Argument Mapping

Before you start...

Useful introductory information about argument mapping and this tutorial.


Set 1 - Simple Arguments

Introduces simple arguments, the most basic units of reasoning. Discusses various kinds, their parts, and how to map them.


Set 2 - Simple Argument Structure

Looks in more detail at the internal structure of simple arguments. Gives simple guidelines for identifying assumptions and ensuring that the whole thing hangs together properly.


Set 3 - Multi-Reason Arguments

Studies arguments in which more than one reason or objection bear upon a single claim. Discusses some common mistakes in mapping such arguments.


Set 4 - Multi-Layer Arguments

In multi-layer arguments, reasons or objections are themselves supported or opposed by further arguments. This set covers the main kinds of multi-layer arguments, how to map them, and how to avoid some common errors.


Set 5 - Inference Objections

Inference objections are a kind of multi-layer argument, and mapping them is particularly challenging. This set shows how to map inference objections as objections to hidden premises.


Set 6 - Macrostructure

The "macrostructure" is the structure of complex arguments on a large scale. This set covers some fundamental principles for producing maps of well-structured complex arguments.

By the end of this tutorial, if you have done the exercises properly, you should have acquired basic skills of argument mapping, and have a deeper understanding of the nature of reasoning and argumentation.

Original link
Argument Mapping: A Visual Way to Prove Your Point
While critical thinking is the lynchpin for almost all academic pursuits, argument mapping is most powerful when used for teaching composition.
Original link
Argument Mapping | Free Template | FigJam
Visualize the logic of an argument with our Argument Mapping Template. Get started for free with FigJam today.
Original link
Research Guides: Critical Thinking Tutorial: Summary of Analyzing Arguments
This tutorial will empower you with valuable critical thinking skills that are essential for your university education.
Original link
Critical Thinking: The Critical Thinking Series, Part 2: What is Argument Mapping?
This article is republished with permission from IntrepidEd News - Augusta Moore In our last post we provided an analysis of Dewey’s definition of “critical thinking.” Generally, critical thinking is
Original link
Digital thinking tools for better decision making
Ever since the very beginning of humanity, tools have played a pivotal role in who we are and what we do. Tools for recording, processing and communicating information have a time-honoured history ...
Original link
Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation - Argumentation
Argument maps represent some arguments more effectively than others. The goal of this article is to account for that variability, so that those who wish to use argument maps can do so with more foresight. I begin by identifying four properties of argument maps that make them useful tools for evaluating arguments. Then, I discuss four types of argument that are difficult to map well: reductio ad absurdum arguments, charges of equivocation, logical analogies, and mathematical arguments. The difficulties presented by these four types appear unrelated to one another, but I show that, in each case, the difficulty can be traced back to the use of metalinguistic reasoning. The need to represent a transition between object language and metalanguage can undermine one or more of the benefits that argument map representation would otherwise confer.
Original link